| Need for
enhanced vessel identification and position reporting Letter to the Australian Government UNICPOLOS delegation: March 10, 2005
Dear
Philip NEED
FOR ENHANCED VESSEL IDENTIFICATION AND POSITION REPORTING The Australian Oceans Office has informed me that I should put my views to you regarding Australia's position at the approaching UNICPOLOS meeting in June. I am writing a second email to you regarding measures to curtail destructive fishing practices, and you will receive this separately. When the Law of the Sea was first discussed and drafted, customs and protocols had established themselves through common usage and international agreements to provide mechanisms ensuring that vessels on the high seas nevertheless remained under the laws of the nations to which those vessels were affiliated. The Law of the Sea consolidated the meaning and importance of flag states, and vessel identification is achieved under the Law of the Sea by the vessel's flag. We live in a world today which is very different to the world as it was in 1984. None of the originators of the Law of the Sea could have foreseen either the advances in technology which enable satellite tracking of vessels, or the major problems caused by overfishing and destructive fishing practices. Neither were the problems of Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing foreseen, which are now so severe as to not only threaten the viability of important commercial fisheries, but to threaten the very existence of species and ecosystems. The continuance of IUU fishing at current scales is such as to also undermine the rule of law, not only on the high seas, but in national Exclusive Economic Zones.
I request that the
Australian delegation to UNICPOLOS: - Such identification devices should report the vessel name and position in real time to a shared global vessel tracking and reporting system, so as to enable authorised agents of any nation to immediately identify and locate any vessel operating either on the high seas or within marine waters under national jurisdiction. I believe that the use of such identification and tracking systems is long overdue, and, while following the logic and principles of the Law of the Sea, brings this important piece of international law up to date. Given the extreme difficulties posed by IUU vessels relating to compliance with both global and regional fishing agreements (not to mention issues surrounding the illegal transport of products, wastes and people) such a system is probably the single most urgent step needed to facilitate enhanced compliance with laws and agreements necessary to ensure the sustainable use of our oceans. Regards Jon
Nevill
|