Catchment Management Plan Model framework 19 October 2000This model is an evolving document. It is drawn substantially from the NSW, Victorian, and South Australian systems at this stage. It is designed to capture the best elements of approaches used in various Australian States. If you wish to contribute to its development, please email me with your suggestions (jon.nevill@bigpond.com). Background Conceptually, a State can establish a water management framework using a central policy-making and funding agency, devolving on-ground operations to Catchment Boards. The State's key statute is the Water Act. Each major river basin has a Catchment Board. The Boards may also draw funds from local government. Membership of Boards is determined by the Water Act to draw on key stakeholder groups. Stakeholder groups nominate candidates from which appointments are made by the State minister responsible for water resources, on 5-year rotations. The Water Act has a central objective, and lists several key principles. The Act requires that actions taken by a Board, and by Board members, must seek to further the objective of the Act, must have regard to the principles listed in the Act, and must (where appropriate) consider the issues listed in the Act. Among those issues, of course, are relevant State statutes and policies, regional strategies, the operations and programs of local water and sewage agencies, and local government planning schemes. The Boards are required to develop, in consultation with the public, Catchment Management Plans (CMPs). These plans incorporate a hierarchy of plans addressing key catchment issues. Water Allocation Plans (WAPs) address the allocation of surface and groundwater. There are also River Management Plans (RMPs), Aquifer Management Plans (AMPs) and Wetland Management Plans (WMPs). Once assessed and approved by the Minister, the CMP becomes a statutory document, and must be formally considered by local government in approving developments or changing local landuse strategies or landuse zoning plans. The CMP must also be considered by State agencies whose works or activities may impact on the catchment, such as road construction authorities. This document provides a model for a CMP. Objective and Principles The plan draws these directly from the Water Act, which in turn draws on key national and international strategies and agreements. These are discussed elsewhere. Cumulative effects The plan recognises the need to manage the cumulative effects of incremental water infrastructure development, and seeks to manage these impacts by the strategic implementation of caps or limits on such developments long before problems arise. The policy under which the plans are prepared recognises that, if the caps are considered only after problems become evident, they are unlikely to be efficient or effective. Matters to be considered The Catchment Management Plan must take into consideration:
Supporting studies The Catchment Management Plan must be prepared after the following information is assembled (with the assistance of the State Water Agency scientific support unit) and examined:
It is absolutely essential that this review provide information on the size of the catchment's water stocks and flows, on the needs of the catchment's water-dependent ecosystems, on the needs of existing domestic, agricultural and industrial users, and on the degree to which the catchment's water resources are already allocated in a median rainfall year, and in 10th and 90th percentile rainfall years. Strategic planning must be undertaken to set limits on human use of catchment water, and where necessary wind back existing human use. Program implementation will be facilitated, within the State framework by:
Catchment Management Plan Specifications:
Measures of Catchment Health: Procedures are to be established to allow monitoring and reporting of river health. These procedures are to include measurement of the Index of Stream Condition in accordance with agreed national protocols. The ISC includes measurements of five key indicator groups: Procedures are to be established to allow monitoring and reporting of aquifer health. These procedures are to include measurement of the Index of Aquifer Condition in accordance with agreed national protocols. The IAC is to include measurements of five key indicators: Additional notes on the use of indicators (both for indexes and special studies): Hydrology indicators: change in volume and seasonality of flow from natural conditions. Biological indicators: riparian and in-stream macrophytes - diversity and abundance; in-stream algae; diversity and abundance indicators for invertebrates, macro-invertebrates, fish, birds, amphibians, reptiles, mammals; aquatic and riparian weeds; aquatic and riparian pest species; wetland area - spatial extent, age structure of vegetation indicating regeneration. Physical and chemical indicators: total phosphorus, electrical conductivity (salinity); turbidity; and pH; contamination by suspected carcinogens or endocrine disruptors. Habitat indicators: connectivity (weirs, dams and levees blocking the movement of fish and water); riparian cover; riparian weeds; woody debris in streams; stream geomorphology - bank stability, bed erosion or aggradation; frequency and timing of flooding, particularly of billabongs and wetlands. Key references: Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand / ANZECC (1998) Implementation guidelines: water quality and catchment management planning. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. ANZECC (1996) National Water Quality Management Strategy: National Principles for the Provision of Water for Ecosystems; Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia, and Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council, Canberra. White LJ & Ladson AR (1999) An Index of Stream Condition: Field Manual. Department of Natural Resources and Environment Victoria; Melbourne. White LJ & Ladson AR (1999) An Index of Stream Condition: Catchment Managers' Manual. Department of Natural Resources and Environment Victoria; Melbourne. White LJ & Ladson AR (1999) An Index of Stream Condition: Users' Manual. Department of Natural Resources and Environment Victoria; Melbourne. White LJ & Ladson AR (1999) An Index of Stream Condition: Reference Manual. Department of Natural Resources and Environment Victoria; Melbourne. |